|
(Re)bonjour à tous et toutes, Je vous fais suivre ce message ci-dessous, suite à une décision
effectivement incroyable. Amicalement T. H. -------- Message transféré --------
Bonjour à tous, Suite au choix incroyable qui a était fait par la Commission Europénne de confier à Elsevier la sous-traitance du "Open Science Monitor" (voir l'article Elsevier are corrupting open Science in
Europe ), une note a été rédigée pour protester
contre ce choix. Vous avez la possibilité de signer cette plainte. Bien cordialement Frédéric Hélein -------- Message transféré --------
Bianca Kramer, sur la liste Scholcom, a publié ceci, qui
est très utile :
As
a follow-up to last week's discussions on the role of
Elsevier in the EU Open Science Monitor, I wanted to share
with you that a formal
complaint has been submitted to the European
Ombudsman.
The
text of the complaint was drafted
collaboratively and openly, and garnered 432
signatures at the time of submission, with the total
number of signatories currently exceeding 700. The
document is still open for signatories, and an additional
list of signatories will be added to the original
submission.
The
original opinion piece of Jon Tennant has meanwhile drawn
a response not only from Elsevier, but also from the
Lisbon Council, the leader of the consortium responsible
for the development of the Open Science monitor. For those
interested in following the discussion, I'm including a
short timeline with links to the relevant pieces.
- June 29 - opinion piece in The Guardian expressing concerns with Elsevier as the sole subcontractor for the European Commission (EC) Open Science Monitor. - July 2 - response by Elsevier on their website, which has also received some comments and annotations. - July 3 - point-by-point reply to Elsevier's response by Jon Tennant on his personal blog - July 4 - overview of the discussion to that date by the news outlet Research Professional, including comments from an EC spokesperson - July 5 - formal complaint filed with the EU Ombudsman accompanied by 432 signatories - July 5 - press release issued by The Lisbon Council, responding to the original Guardian article. This was addressed to the Science Editor of The Guardian. - July 6 - point-by-point reply to Lisbon Council's response by Jon Tennant on his personal blog
kind regards,
Bianca
La question des revues hybrides est cruciale. Grosso
modo, je pense qu'aucun organisme subventionnaire de la
recherche ne devrait soutenir le paiement des APC dans ce
cas. Je m'oppose aux APC en général, mais tout
particulièrement dans ce cas.
Cordialement,
Jean-Claude
|